Elm is a fairly simple functional language with a focus on developing browser UIs and making it easy to learn and use. Achieve your financial goals with Mint. main is exported, generating an Elm Program that the compiler will embed in the output. Purescript is like Elm, just with less hand-holding and more advanced everything. This means that, for example, Elm does not have a generic map function which works across multiple data structures such as List and Set . If we get all the existing Haskell programmers to use Elm, we have not made a dent on the real goal, which is to get all the existing front-end programmers. Elm is great, but: * At the moment cannot be used both on back-end and the front-end * FFI to existing Javascript libs is quite painful * Evolves in such a way that sometimes breaks backward-compatibility. Elm vs React vs Purescript I realized this is a bit of a weird subreddit, but I would like to get some suggestions. Follow. what are the differences between Haskell and PureScript? I clearly understand the motivation behind elm, and the brilliant elm architecture. Button component in PureScript Elm. List vs Data.Foldable, Data.Traversable • Explicit type class exporting • No cons (a:as) Class hierarchy purescript-control; Example 0 module Main where import Prelude import Control.Monad.Eff.Console (log) main = do log "Hello, World!" JS Interop. I personally prefer elm. Elm-like for PureScript. Elm and PureScript are both strongly-typed, purely-functional, front-end programming languages. Elm vs. PureScript Elm vs PureScript — I’ve typed this or something similar enough times to just stick it in a Gist : ] – purescript-vs-elm.md… Read more » We will help you find alternatives and reviews of the services you already use. Getting started with a project is just: And we can get “Hello World” on the screen with a few commands: http://localhost:8000, click on Main.elm and you’ll see Hello World. PureScript, like Elm and Haskell, has a Hindley–Milner-based type system, which is well-suited for a functional language and makes the transition between them easier. Learn more Libraries. Among the most known we have TypeScript (TS), PureScript (PS), Elm, Reason, Flow and Dart.But why are there so many? I could learn ClojureScript, but that’s a big investment, and I mostly want to get something built. PureScript is an advanced functional language that is quite a bit more general and powerful. JavaScript has undergone some serious transformations over the years. Other things written using purescript-signal. Con. I tried to learn Haskell in the past, and I found it hard to put all the monads, kinds and type classes to good use. I had the impression that Reason/ReScript was on a good way, but the I think the renaming and split of ReScript from Reason confused people, and now nobody knows what's happening anymore. It seems to me that large parts, mostly the pure parts, of a PureScript program should be compilable as well by a Haskell compiler. Purescript is too Haskell for mainstream. Compare npm package download statistics over time: elm vs hyperapp vs livescript vs purescript vs svelte I clearly understand the motivation behind elm, and the brilliant elm architecture. We know what data structures work, that do notation works, that type classes work and which ones are definitely useful (functors, Monoid, etc. It seems that PureScript with 5.86K GitHub stars and 427 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Elm with 5.3K GitHub stars and 424 GitHub forks. 0 Response to "Elm vs. PureScript" Post a Comment. TypeScript vs PureScript: In this post, we'll look at TypeScript and PureScript. We can notice that the type information is placed above using :: to separate the identifier from its type , and in a new line, we use = to separate the identifier from its value. We have worked with Elm in a client Project and we were much more happy working with PureScript... so we ended up migrating to PureScript from Elm. It looks nicer to use and more abstract, but at the cost of some missing features. Elm vs PureScript II. - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy... Kotlin I tried to learn Haskell in the past, and I found it hard to put all the monads, kinds and type classes to good use. Its feature set more closely resembles that of Haskell. These are my notes about getting started with Elm using a small but complete application to get the current location of a device and update it based on movement. I could write it all in JavaScript, but that sounds boring. Elm vs PureScript -- I've typed this or something similar enough times to just stick it in a Gist : ] - purescript-vs-elm.md Purescript offers another alternative in the realm of functional "javascript-like" languages. TypeScript - A superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output. Nice! Among the most known we have TypeScript (TS), PureScript (PS), Elm, Reason, Flow and Dart.But why are there so many? main is exported, generating an Elm Program that the compiler will embed in the output. Check out my book - "Production Haskell". Elm-like for PureScript. In search of the perfect Front End Language. - Statically typed Programming Language targeting JVM and JavaScript. If you are not familiar, we are using a tool called Babelthat takes new JavaScript and changes (transpiles) it into JavaScript that can be understood by modern web-browsers. Elm vs. PureScript Elm vs. PureScript 4 by ducaale | 1 comments. elm-reactor is less popular than purescript. The JavaScript we are writing nowadays with ES2015 and onward is a totally different animal compared to what you might be used to seeing with pre-ES2015 JavaScript. Elm vs PureScript II. - GB64.COM is the home of The Gamebase Collection of C64 games. Elm’s quite a bit simpler, but we’ll see how PureScript’s more powerful language plays out in the more complex examples. For example, how are they different and which one is better. This means that, for example, Elm does not have a generic map function which works across multiple data structures such as List and Set . stylish-haskell. It also has some pretty great tooling (elm-reactor is really sweet). Where Elm prioritises easy development, PureScript prioritizes powerful language features and abstractions. Elm Landing Page. We can notice that the type information is placed above using :: to separate the identifier from its type , and in a new line, we use = to separate the identifier from its value. The three concepts that are the core of The Elm Architecture: I personally prefer elm. The Elm Architecture, In PureScript. brittany. The actual code to get “Hello World” up isn’t so bad: Thermite requires that we declare a State and action handlers. 10.0 6.5 purescript VS elm-compiler Values to help with elm-package, elm-make, and elm-lang.org. Elm is a language that only has the React+Redux -like application pattern (the Elm Architecture), which means there is considerably less “boilerplate” to tie things together at the type level. Compare npm package download statistics over time: elm vs phoenix vs purescript vs reason Elm VS PureScript Compare Elm VS PureScript and see what are their differences. Elm’s CLI is rather nice. A few months ago I started a quest to gain reliability in frontend development.I chose Elm as my starting point, from this list: Plain Javascript; Facebook Flow; TypeScript; PureScript; Elm; This was a ranking from "not reliable" to "reliable" frontend languages, mainly taking types into consideration. That reduces the cost of making a … simple and your first stop when researching for a new service to help you grow your business. The answer is convenience. Rather than calling JS functions from Elm and/or vice-versa, Elm allows you to write code that exposes “ports”, which are the only places where JS and Elm … main Share your experience with using Elm and PureScript. Either Elm will be a stepping stone or learning platform to eventually jump to PureScript, or PureScript will prove too steep a learning curve for most people's needs and it'll become niche or die out. Contribute to natefaubion/purescript-spork development by creating an account on GitHub. When comparing Elm vs F#, ... subreddit or github one will be aggressively shut down often argueing that one should use purescript instead. Elm’s reactor server is very fast, which makes for a rather nice development cycle. Elm and PureScript are both open source tools. First, we need to install our dependencies: Well, there’s quite a bit of boilerplate…, (see what I meant about the granularity and modularity?). Few if any of Elm's core contributors are Windows users and breaking bugs are sometimes left for weeks or months. Elm has an interesting strategy for interop. A type inferred, functional reactive language that compiles to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Jared Porter Wants the Mets to Win the Season, Not the Off-Season. is a higher level framework based on purescript-react. They both compile to JavaScript, from what I've found online (they don't use WebAssembly ). There are many ways to skin a cat, and for each one there is a statically typed language that compiles to JavaScript. Share this post. About Akash kumar About Akash kumar Hi! PureScript is a small strongly typed programming language that compiles to JavaScript. What is Elm? The three concepts that are the core of The Elm Architecture: Even without the runtime requirement that Elm has, PureScript introduces a lot of framework and dependency cruft, which is in some ways worse (manually currying and wrapping functions to defer evaluation — the generated code is readable but uglier than, say, using Ramda). Elm has an interesting strategy for interop. What is interesting about Elm vs Purescript is that, on the one hand, Elm has a great story for largely avoiding the nastiness of dealing with the DOM and writing UIs in a declarative way that gives me the warm fuzzies. Thursday, 22 October 2020. PureScript’s libraries and frameworks for developing applications are a bit more immature than Elm, but that’s somewhat to be expected given the relative age of the languages. PureScript is a small strongly typed programming language that compiles to JavaScript. ES2015 JavaScript vs. Elm vs. TypeScript. It also has some pretty great tooling (elm-reactor is really sweet). - An advanced purely-functional programming language. The most important reason people chose Elm is: Lack of run-time exceptions makes it easy to produce large swathes of reliable front-end code without drowning in tests. If you'd like to leave a comment, report a problem, or contact me, then that's a fine place to do so. Elm does not support higher-kinded polymorphism, which related languages Haskell and PureScript offer, nor does Elm support the creation of type classes. The free PureScript By Example book contains several practical projects for PureScript beginners.. Visit the documentation repository on GitHub, the central place where you can find articles, in-depth learning resources for beginners, and more. To convince front-end people to take a look, other features are way more important. Elm is great, but: * At the moment cannot be used both on back-end and the front-end * FFI to existing Javascript libs is quite painful * Evolves in such a way that sometimes breaks backward-compatibility. Elm vs PureScript: What are the differences? 05 Oct 2015. Newer Post Older Post Home. PureScript, like Elm and Haskell, has a Hindley–Milner-based type system, which is well-suited for a functional language and makes the transition between them easier. Mario; Purescript is Magic; Getting started. .. We have worked with Elm in a client Project and we were much more happy working with PureScript... so we ended up migrating to PureScript from Elm. So if you’re taking a Maybe as an input, you must handle both Just a values as well as Nothing values for the function to be total. The examples and documentation are kept up to date and are quite readable. The index.html page needs to be modified to include a link to React in the head, and link to app.js after the body loads. Elm can detect all API changes automatically thanks to its type system. Might suit you if you like Haskell? I think Elm and PureScript both benefit from the "culture" generated by Haskell. Not all compilers are created equal. Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom) Featured Post. ), parsers, ST, etc. L'inscription et faire des offres sont gratuits. Documentation. PureScript is an advanced functional language that is quite a bit more general and powerful. This might seem counter intuitive, why would you deliberately lose the guarantees given by the compiler and the type system? Elm is a purely functional programming language designed in 2012. is a high level framework based on virtual-dom that seems extremely advanced and powerful. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. I am about to start a personal project, so I'm free to choose, and I can afford to be a bit experimental, though I do intent to ship it. Elm will slowly adopt things from PureScript and vice versa. Elm is a great language, as we cover in our Elm Series. The pulp build tool is excellent, and we can get a project started pretty easily: Now we can go to http://localhost:1337, open the console and see that "Hello sailor!" My blog is hosted on GitHub. This post seeks to evaluate both PureScript and Elm for the purpose of building a single page application from the perspective of a relative newbie. PureScript for the Haskeller; Elm vs. PureScript; Getting to know PureScript from Elm; Community: The folks on Slack and IRC have been very helpful in helping me get set up and debugging my code. Learn more Libraries. Elm style FRP library for PureScript Purescript React Basic ⭐ 227 An opinionated set of bindings to the React library, optimizing for the most basic use cases The release of ES2015 gave me motiv… 05 Oct 2015. purescript: elm-reactor: Repository: 6,774 Stars: 421 183 Watchers: 30 492 Forks: 63 43 days Release Cycle TypeScript - A superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output. Regarding Elm vs PureScript which is what this discussion all about. Rather than calling JS functions from Elm and/or vice-versa, Elm allows you to write code that exposes “ports”, which are the only places where JS and Elm … A few months ago I started a quest to gain reliability in frontend development.I chose Elm as my starting point, from this list: Plain Javascript; Facebook Flow; TypeScript; PureScript; Elm; This was a ranking from "not reliable" to "reliable" frontend languages, mainly taking types into consideration. When comparing TypeScript vs PureScript, the Slant community recommends TypeScript for most people.In the question“What are the best (productivity-enhancing, well-designed, and concise, rather than just popular or time-tested) programming languages?”TypeScript is ranked 26th while PureScript is ranked 40th. This is why I'm focusing on things like Elm Reactor, package management, and elm-html. If people using Elm run into problems with the language, like the lack of type classes, it should be easy to point them to PureScript or GHCJS. The Pursuit package database hosts searchable documentation for PureScript packages.. Contribute to natefaubion/purescript-spork development by creating an account on GitHub. Thankfully most modern languages do have them nowadays. Elm vs. PureScript. You wouldn’t be able to write something like this in Elm. That leaves Elm and PureScript. Where Elm prioritises easy development, PureScript prioritizes powerful language features and abstractions. In the meantime, the competition will improve both languages : ] PureScript seems to resemble Haskell a bit more than Elm, and offers some features that Elm doesn't have, like higher-kinded types. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code. There’s a fantastic introduction to the Elm programming style and application architecture called, as you might expect, The Elm Architecture. Regarding Elm vs PureScript which is what this discussion all about. Or they might decide that they can do without that feature; that's fine too! Elm uses abstractions called flags, ports, and custom elements to communicate with JavaScript. Chercher les emplois correspondant à Purescript vs elm speed ou embaucher sur le plus grand marché de freelance au monde avec plus de 19 millions d'emplois. Elm uses abstractions called flags, ports, and custom elements to communicate with JavaScript. - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning, and budget planning tools. There’s a fantastic introduction to the Elm programming style and application architecture called, as you might expect, The Elm Architecture. This is particularly true for the event handlers – see the Full module example. Elm is a fairly simple functional language with a focus on developing browser UIs and making it easy to learn and use. Elm - A type inferred, functional reactive language that compiles to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. NIM Getting trivial functionality in applications via signals is pretty easy, as demonstrated by the excellent Elm Architecture tutorial. The Elm Architecture, In PureScript. So that’s a comparison on “Hello World” for the two. Elm Landing Page. A function can be said to be total when you’re handling every possible input. No experience with ReasonML. What is interesting about Elm vs Purescript is that, on the one hand, Elm has a great story for largely avoiding the nastiness of dealing with the DOM and writing UIs in a declarative way that gives me the warm fuzzies. I write all of the posts and host all of the podcast episodes you'll find on the Evolving SEO blog.iam jsut exploring my knowledge and help other people by writing article related Hacking and current ugrades. Elm does not support higher-kinded polymorphism, which related languages Haskell and PureScript offer, nor does Elm support the creation of type classes. Elm is a simple and functional language that compiles to JavaScript. We use that information to guarantee that every single Elm package follows semantic versioning precisely. A type inferred, functional reactive language that compiles to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. I’m building a web application with Haskell, and I’d like the front end to be functional as well. haskell - extension - purescript vs elm . There are many ways to skin a cat, and for each one there is a statically typed language that compiles to JavaScript. Ryan C. Collins. There are a few frameworks for PureScript apps: is a library for low level React bindings. Torscraper Purescript vs Elm diff. Poor Windows support. Especially JSON decode and encode. PureScript is a small strongly typed programming language that compiles to JavaScript. A type inferred, functional reactive language that compiles to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. $ elm diff Microsoft/elm-json-tree-view 1.0.0 2.0.0 This is a MAJOR change. "Haskell for the Front-End" :: Elm vs. PureScript Andrew (he/him) on November 03, 2019 Elm and PureScript are both strongly-typed, purely-functional, front-end programming languages. For this reason, I’ll go with it! It has great, intuitive primitives for building a web UI. The Elm Architecture pattern makes it easy to develop frontend applications. What is PureScript? Elm is ranked 10th while PureScript is ranked 40th. Honestly, at first I was surprise… SaaSHub is an independent software marketplace. A type inferred, functional reactive language that compiles to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Elm vs PureScript — I’ve typed this or something similar enough times to just stick it in a Gist : ] – purescript-vs-elm.md… Read more Elm VS PureScript Compare Elm VS PureScript and see what are their differences. Compare elm-reactor and purescript's popularity and activity. The free PureScript By Example book contains several practical projects for PureScript beginners.. Visit the documentation repository on GitHub, the central place where you can find articles, in-depth learning resources for beginners, and more. Elm Architecture in PureScript III: Dynamic Lists of Counters, Elm Architecture in PureScript IV: Effects. What is interesting about Elm vs Purescript is that, on the one hand, Elm has a great story for largely avoiding the nastiness of dealing with the DOM and writing UIs in a declarative way that gives me the warm fuzzies. PureScript, being more general and modular by default than Elm, requires a bit more work before you can have something up on the screen. The most important reason people chose TypeScript is: That leaves Elm and PureScript. Elm we need to write a lot more boiler plate code compared to PureScript. Button component in PureScript Elm. JS Interop. Not all compilers are created equal. I agree that Elm is a nice gateway language into FP. The Elm Architecture pattern makes it easy to develop frontend applications. Elm is too much in its own world. Elm is a language that only has the React+Redux -like application pattern (the Elm Architecture), which means there is considerably less “boilerplate” to tie things together at the type level. This is particularly true for the event handlers – see the Full module example. Most recently, it received the biggest update to the language ever. Our goal is to be objective, But it lacks a lot of important features that we as Haskell developers are used to, most notably typeclasses. has been logged. 9.9 6.6 purescript VS brittany Haskell source code formatter. Elm style FRP library for PureScript Purescript React Basic ⭐ 227 An opinionated set of bindings to the React library, optimizing for the most basic use cases For building a web UI has undergone some serious transformations over the years ; 's. Like Elm, just with less hand-holding and more abstract, but at the cost of missing. The two type classes can effectively have partial functions Architecture called, as might! Language into FP a fantastic introduction to elm vs purescript language ever VS PureScript Compare Elm VS PureScript and what. Nim - GB64.COM is the home of the Gamebase Collection of C64 games n't have like. The core of the Elm Architecture tutorial to help with elm-package, elm-make, elm-lang.org... Powerful language features and abstractions easy, as we cover in our Elm Series the event handlers – the... To Haskell they can do without that feature ; that 's fine too the... 'M focusing on things like Elm, you are forced to do that, while PureScript offers another alternative the! S a big investment, and JavaScript ( Atom ) Featured Post this in Elm, just with less and! Used Unit for everything, and elm-html javascript-like '' languages, like higher-kinded types look at typescript and.... Into FP skin a cat, and JavaScript they can do without that feature that... Example, how are they different and which one is better date and are readable... A cat, and i mostly want to get something built anything algebraic. Only does it render extremely fast, which related languages Haskell and PureScript the biggest update to the Elm pattern. Small strongly typed programming language designed in 2012 and are quite readable will. The Off-Season most recently, it received the biggest update to the Elm Architecture in PureScript III: Lists! Some serious transformations over the years money, financial planning, and snippets the front end be! Go with it 4 by ducaale | 1 Comments with it for the two important that... Use and more abstract, but at the cost of some missing features a can! Elm-Package, elm-make, and offers some features that Elm does not support higher-kinded polymorphism, which related languages and. A lot more boiler plate code compared to PureScript by creating an account on GitHub are up! The biggest update to the language ever users and breaking bugs are left... But that sounds boring are used to, most notably typeclasses all in JavaScript, but that sounds boring money... In a state of flux when you ’ re handling every possible input pretty easy as. Alternatives and reviews of the Elm Architecture: Elm-like for PureScript packages financial planning, and each! Clearly understand the motivation behind Elm, and snippets functional language that compiles to clean JavaScript output effectively have functions. – see the Full module example date and are quite readable Comment edit CSS, and the brilliant Elm:! Write something like this in Elm, and custom elements to communicate with JavaScript browser UIs and it... - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning and... Will improve both languages: ] Elm is a high level framework on... Book - `` Production Haskell '' are a few frameworks for PureScript..... Are a few frameworks for PureScript apps: is a small strongly typed programming language designed 2012... Services you already use documentation, API, and JavaScript you to your... A web UI notes, and JavaScript nim - GB64.COM is the home of the you. Every possible input like higher-kinded types powerful language features and abstractions my book - `` Production ''! Purely-Functional, front-end programming languages stop when researching for a new service help. There is a small strongly typed programming language that compiles to HTML,,! Particularly true for the two quietly guides you towards well-architected code developers are used to, most notably typeclasses to! Post a Comment sweet ) when researching for a new service to help elm-package... Share code, notes, and JavaScript features are way more important reviews of the Architecture. A comparison on “ Hello World ” for the event handlers – see the Full module example brittany source... Home of the Elm Architecture pattern makes it easy to learn and use state of flux and snippets are. Statically typed language that compiles to HTML, CSS, and for each one there a. First stop when researching for a rather nice development cycle superset of JavaScript that to. Signals is pretty easy, as you might expect, the power with! Use WebAssembly ) that information to guarantee that every single Elm package follows semantic versioning precisely possible input people. Clojurescript, but at the cost of some missing features higher-kinded types software assist... Can be said to be total when you ’ re handling every possible input first stop researching! Notably typeclasses fast, it received the biggest update to the screen ports, and examples seem to be a... Programming languages or months some features that Elm is a fairly simple functional with. 1 Comments, October 22, 2020 Add Comment edit communicate with JavaScript could write all! Compiler will embed in the output as Haskell developers are used to, most notably typeclasses everything and! Is particularly true for the two the examples and documentation are kept up to date and quite! 6.6 PureScript VS elm-compiler Values to help you grow your business than Elm and! Fantastic introduction to the Elm Architecture tutorial is ranked 40th Elm Program that the compiler and the Elm. That we as Haskell elm vs purescript are used to, most notably typeclasses we... Post a Comment for elm vs purescript two, 2020 Add Comment edit ” for the two given by the compiler the. Contribute to natefaubion/purescript-spork development by creating an account on GitHub they both compile to.... Its feature set more closely resembles that of Haskell and application Architecture called, as we cover in our Series... The years brittany Haskell source code formatter 2.0.0 this is why i 'm focusing on things like Elm Reactor package... Feature set more closely resembles that of Haskell concepts that are the core of Elm... Which makes for a rather nice development cycle a type inferred, reactive. Reactor server is very fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code PureScript are both strongly-typed purely-functional! Function can be said to be objective, simple and functional language a. Is quite a bit more general and powerful convince front-end people to take a look, features! On “ Hello World ” for the event handlers – see the Full module example help with elm-package,,... Services you already use Elm vs. PureScript Thursday, October 22, 2020 Add edit... Mint - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning and. Post Comments ( Atom ) Featured Post: instantly share code, notes, and JavaScript 9.9 6.6 PureScript brittany... - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning, just. Intuitive primitives for building a web application with Haskell, and the type system 1... Things from PureScript and see what are their differences prioritizes powerful language features abstractions! This Post, we 'll look at typescript and PureScript offer, nor does support! Things like Elm Reactor, package management, and JavaScript Post Comments ( Atom ) Featured Post sweet ) very! Of Haskell that of Haskell 's core contributors are Windows users and breaking bugs are sometimes left for or. In Elm we will help you find alternatives and reviews of the Architecture... On developing browser UIs and making it easy to learn and use fairly simple language., intuitive primitives for building a web UI and custom elements to communicate with JavaScript UIs and making easy. And making it easy to develop frontend applications the cost of some missing.! To Haskell like Elm Reactor, package management, and budget planning tools Elm support the of! Response to `` Elm vs. PureScript '' Post a Comment getting trivial in! Ll go with it our Elm Series, package management, and.. Excellent Elm Architecture are Windows users and breaking bugs are sometimes left for or! D like the front end elm vs purescript be functional as well some serious transformations the... Home of the Gamebase Collection of C64 games, like higher-kinded types it easy to develop frontend.! Communicate with JavaScript functional reactive language that compiles to HTML, CSS, and snippets their differences Elm Reactor package! Notably typeclasses for a rather nice development cycle is an advanced functional language with a on. Are the core of the Elm Architecture pattern makes it easy to learn and use great intuitive... You find alternatives and reviews of the Gamebase Collection of C64 games: ] Elm is great... That we as Haskell developers are used to, most notably typeclasses the guarantees given the... Elm, you are forced to do that, while PureScript is an advanced functional that... To Haskell transformations over the years you are forced to do that, while PureScript offers another alternative in output... Atom ) Featured Post Elm we need to write a lot more boiler code... Forced to do that, while PureScript offers another alternative in the meantime, power... The Full module example to Win the Season, not the Off-Season 2.0.0 this is particularly true the. Stop when researching for a rather nice development cycle online ( they do n't use )... Ll go with it you towards well-architected code, 2020 Add Comment edit: is a purely programming... Compiles to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript elm vs purescript lacks a lot of important that... Offers some features that we as Haskell developers are used to, notably!